水力发电学报
            首 页   |   期刊介绍   |   编委会   |   投稿须知   |   下载中心   |   联系我们   |   学术规范   |   编辑部公告   |   English

水力发电学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 67-77.doi: 10.11660/slfdxb.20210907

• • 上一篇    下一篇

竖井位置对双向贯流泵装置水力特性的影响

  

  • 出版日期:2021-09-25 发布日期:2021-09-25

Influence of shaft location on hydraulic characteristics of bidirectional tubular pump systems

  • Online:2021-09-25 Published:2021-09-25

摘要: 双向竖井贯流泵作为一种可实现双向抽引的低扬程泵装置形式,在平原城市地区应用广泛,而竖井布置位置一直是工程实际中需要考虑的问题之一。本文通过三维造型软件建立模型,并使用全结构化网格划分方法划分竖井流道、直管流道、叶轮段及导叶段网格,数值计算控制方程为连续性方程、k-ε湍流模型方程和雷诺时均方程并采用稳态计算对双向竖井贯流泵装置进行模拟。计算分别模拟了竖井贯流泵的竖井前置、后置两种情况下泵装置叶轮正向反向运行共计四种运行情况的水力性能特性。结果表明,设计工况下无论竖井后置或是前置,泵装置正向运行效率皆高于反向运行。无论泵装置正反向运行,竖井流道和直管式流道作为进水流道时流态皆较为平顺,水力性能差异不大;泵装置正向运行时竖井流道和直管式流道作为出水流道时尽管因造型不同内部流态有所差异但总体水力损失较小。反向运行时出水流道环量不能被导叶回收,产生能量损失较正向运行大,而此时竖井流道作为出水流道水力性能要劣于直管式出水流道。

关键词: 双向泵, 竖井流道, 数值模拟, 水力性能

Abstract: Bidirectional shaft tubular pump, a type of low-head pump device for bidirectional pumping, is widely used in plain urban areas, and the location of its shaft has always been a problem to be considered in engineering practice. In this study, a three-dimensional modeling software is used to construct the model of the pump flow system comprising the shaft runner, straight pipe runner, impeller section, and guide vane section, using structured meshing method to generate the grid of all sections. Steady flows in the two-way shaft tubular pump device are simulated by solving the continuity equation, k-ε turbulence model equations and Reynolds average equations; Hydraulic performances of the pump are calculated for the forward and reverse operation modes of its impeller and two schemes of front shaft and rear shaft. The results show that under the design condition, the forward mode efficiency is higher than that of reverse mode regardless of the rear or front position of the pump shaft. In either forward or reverse operating mode, the flows in the shaft runner and straight pipe runner, when both located at the pump inlet side, manifest relatively smooth patterns, the difference between the hydraulic performance of both modes is small; In forward operating mode, when these two components are located at the outlet side, their flow patterns are different due to different shapes, but the overall head loss of the pump is small. In reverse operating mode, the circulation of the outlet runner cannot be fully suppressed by guide vanes, resulting in a head loss greater than that in forward operating mode. Under this condition, the hydraulic performance of the shaft runner as the outlet runner is worse than the straight pipe runner as the outlet runner.

Key words: bidirectional pump, shaft passage, numerical simulation, hydraulic performance

京ICP备13015787号-3
版权所有 © 2013《水力发电学报》编辑部
编辑部地址:中国北京清华大学水电工程系 邮政编码:100084 电话:010-62783813
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn