水力发电学报
            首 页   |   期刊介绍   |   编委会   |   投稿须知   |   下载中心   |   联系我们   |   学术规范   |   编辑部公告   |   English

水力发电学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9): 50-59.doi: 10.11660/slfdxb.20260905

• • 上一篇    下一篇

均压管节流装置对间隙流动及顶盖补气的影响

  

  • 出版日期:2026-09-25 发布日期:2026-09-25

Effect of pressure equalizing tube throttling device on gap flow and head cover air admission

  • Online:2026-09-25 Published:2026-09-25

摘要: 为改善广东梅州抽水蓄能电站水泵水轮机组运行稳定性,本研究提出在机组均压管处设置节流装置,选取SST k-ω湍流模型以及VOF多相流模型,对不同直径节流孔(相对直径d/D = 0.238,0.298,0.357,0.476以及无节流孔)的转轮与顶盖间隙进行数值模拟。结果表明:节流孔尺寸减小会导致间隙流态不稳定,节流孔尺寸增大会增加间隙泄漏量,降低下壁面轴向力。节流孔相对直径≥ 0.357时,在对轴向力影响不大的前提下,有效降低泄漏量;补气速率对补气孔处压力影响较小,节流孔直径减小会使腔体压力升高,导致补气孔处压力增大;在d/D为0.476时,间隙腔体含气率最高,为0.232,补气效果最优,间隙外腔为主要存气区域;综合间隙流动与补气效果表明,d/D = 0.476为最优尺寸。本文研究结果为优化均压管结构设计、提升机组安全稳定运行提供了理论依据,具有重要工程价值。

关键词: 间隙流动, 均压管, 泄漏量, 轴向力, 顶盖补气

Abstract: To improve the behavior of flows in the runner-headcover gap, this paper describes a novel throttling device installed in the pressure equalizing pipe of a pump-turbine unit, focusing on its effects on flow regime and air admission in the gap. We conduct numerical simulations of the runner-head cover gap, using the CFD method, the SST k-ω turbulence model, and the Volume of Fluid (VOF) multiphase flow model. And, in a case study of the Meizhou pumped storage station, throttling orifices with different diameters (relative diameters d/D = 0.238, 0.298, 0.357, 0.476) are examined and compared against the case of no installation. Results show a smaller throttling orifice size induces vortices and backflows in the equalizing pipe. The size has a significant influence on the gap leakage flow rate and the axial force on the lower wall, and a considerable effect on the air admission performance; The flow rate, under the condition of d/D ≥ 0.357, is lowered effectively with little impact on the wall force. At d/D = 0.476, peak values occur in the total gas volume fraction and the fraction in the outer cavity of the gap, indicating the best air admission effect under this orifice condition. For the study case, we recommend the optimal size of d/D = 0.476 based on a comprehensive consideration of the gap flow and air admission performance. Our findings lay a basis for optimizing the structural design of the unit’s equalizing pipe and improving the units safe and stable operation.

Key words: gap flow, pressure equalizing pipe, leakage flow rate, axial force, head cover air admission

京ICP备13015787号-3
版权所有 © 2013《水力发电学报》编辑部
编辑部地址:中国北京清华大学水电工程系 邮政编码:100084 电话:010-62783813
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn