水力发电学报
            首 页   |   期刊介绍   |   编委会   |   投稿须知   |   下载中心   |   联系我们   |   学术规范   |   编辑部公告   |   English

水力发电学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 39-49.doi: 10.11660/slfdxb.20260804

• • 上一篇    下一篇

不同流速仪量测竖井式进/出水口孔口流速的差异性分析

  

  • 出版日期:2026-08-25 发布日期:2026-08-25

Analysis of flow velocity differences at vertical pipe inlet-outlet orifices measured by different velocimeters

  • Online:2026-08-25 Published:2026-08-25

摘要: 竖井式进/出水口是抽水蓄能电站进/出水口的主要形式之一,因其结构特点出流时孔口底部产生反向流速,但反向流速值及范围均相对较小,对试验测点的布置和流速仪的要求较高。针对有的竖井式进/出水口模型试验因不合适的量测方法得出孔口底部无反向流速的假象,本文专门比较了不同流速仪和测点布置方法量测的孔口断面流速分布的差异。结果表明,出流时孔口底部存在反向流速,干扰小、能近底的流速仪才能量测到底部反向流速;而干扰大、不能近底的流速仪和沿垂线测点数少,是导致得出孔口底部无反向流速假象的原因。不同类型的流速仪,由于其原理和结构不同,所测同一测点的流速值相差较大,特别是当流速很小时,同一测点的流速值相差75.00% ~ 150%,例如距底0.96 m的测点,声学多普勒流速仪测得流速0.02 m/s,电磁流速仪测得0.05 m/s,流速值相差150%。对于流速分布不均匀的断面,应布置多条测线,且合理布置测点,沿垂线至少7 ~ 9个测点,只有给出完整的沿垂线的流速分布,才能揭示其流速分布规律,得到符合实际的水力指标,例如出流工况各孔口流速不均匀系数,沿垂线8个测点时为2.39 ~ 2.48,沿垂线3个测点时为1.78 ~ 2.07,表明测点布置方式对水力指标评价影响显著,测点数量不足可能导致水力性能被高估。研究成果对采用试验方法研究流动规律及优化进/出水口体型具有重要指导意义。

关键词: 抽水蓄能电站, 竖井式进/出水口, 反向流速, 流速仪, 流速值差异分析, 测点布置方法

Abstract: The reversible inlet-outlet device of a vertical pipe is a major type of the bidirectional intake-outlet structures adopted by pumped storage power stations. Backflows usually occur at the bottom of its orifice in the outflow mode due to the structural characteristics, but the backflow velocity and its spatial extent are relatively small, requiring a very sensitive velocimeter and a careful arrangement of the gauge positions. Such backflows could not be detected in the model tests if the measurements were inappropriate. This paper compares the differences in the measurements of velocity distributions at the orifice section, produced by adopting different velocimeters or different gauge arrangements. The results show that the backflow occurs in our test cases, and they are not detectable unless the velocimeter produces interference low enough and keeps effective when the gauge is very close to the orifice bottom. The backflow was missed in the previous studies that adopted high-interference velocimeters, failed to measure the positions close enough to the bottom, or arranged only a small number of gauge points over the cross-section. We find that significant differences in the measured velocity at the same position by adopting different types of velocimeters that are different in the structures and measuring principles, especially in the low flow velocity cases, reaching the range of 75.0% - 150%. For a cross section with uneven velocity distribution, multiple gauge lines should be arranged; each line should have enough points, such as more than 7 - 9. The velocity pattern and hydraulic parameters cannot be obtained accurately unless the complete vertical profiles of flow velocity are observed. This study would be useful for further experimental study of the flow patterns in the reversible inlet-outlet device.

Key words: pumped storage power station, vertical pipe inlet and outlet, negative flow velocity, velocimeter, analysis of differences in velocity values, measurement point layout method

京ICP备13015787号-3
版权所有 © 2013《水力发电学报》编辑部
编辑部地址:中国北京清华大学水电工程系 邮政编码:100084 电话:010-62783813
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn