水力发电学报
            首 页   |   期刊介绍   |   编委会   |   投稿须知   |   下载中心   |   联系我们   |   学术规范   |   编辑部公告   |   English

水力发电学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9): 107-116.doi: 10.11660/slfdxb.20260910

• • 上一篇    下一篇

兼作梁翼缘的钢闸门面板折算应力验算统一公式

  

  • 出版日期:2026-09-25 发布日期:2026-09-25

Unified formula for calculating equivalent stress in steel gate panels functioning as beam flanges

  • Online:2026-09-25 Published:2026-09-25

摘要: 《水利水电工程钢闸门设计规范》规定,主梁作为水工钢闸门的主要承载构件按弹性设计,挡水面板具有较大的强度储备考虑局部塑性按弹塑性设计;但面板兼作梁翼缘时折算应力强度按弹塑性设计是很危险的,特别是对高水头闸门或抽蓄闸门。基于此,本文从功能分割出发,对挡水功能的面板局部弯曲强度按塑性设计,而对兼作梁翼缘功能的面板整体弯曲强度按弹性设计,提出了面板折算应力强度验算新准则;对现行规范的折算应力乘以扩大系数给出了面板折算应力验算新公式,通过对比分析弹性、塑性、折算应力及本文区别功能的折算应力四种安全验算公式,验证了本文公式的合理性。结果表明:现行规范兼作梁翼缘的面板折算应力强度验算存在安全风险,区别功能的新折算应力扩大20% ~ 35%;两个高水头平面闸门的工程算例验证证明了本文新折算应力验算公式的正确性和合理性,为高水头闸门安全设计及规范的修订提供理论依据。

关键词: 水工钢闸门, 面板折算应力公式, 梁整体弯曲应力, 面板局部弯曲应力, 面板设计方法

Abstract: Design Specification for Steel Gates of Water and Hydropower Projects stipulates that the main beam, as the principal load-bearing component of a hydraulic steel gate, shall be designed as an elastic structure; the water-stopping panel, which has a large strength margin, shall be designed as an elastoplastic structure that accounts for local plasticity. However, applying the plastic-elastic design for the converted stress strength of panels functioning as beam flanges is highly hazardous, particularly for high-head gates or pumped-storage gates. Based on this, this paper presents a new verification criterion for the equivalent stress strength of panels by separating the design functionally-a plastic design for the local bending strength of the panel performing water-retaining function, and an elastic design for the overall bending strength of the panel also serving as a beam flange. We derive a new formula for verifying panel equivalent stress by multiplying the equivalent stress from current codes by an expansion factor. This formula is validated through a comparative analysis of four safety verification formulas-elastic, plastic, equivalent stress, and the function-differentiated equivalent stress described in this paper. Results indicate the current code's verification method for this equivalent stress strength poses safety risks, while our new formula increases its value by 20% to 35%. Engineering case studies of two high-head flat gates verify the accuracy and rationality of the new formula, laying a basis for high-head gate design and code revision.

Key words: hydraulic steel gates, panel equivalent stress formula, beam overall bending stress, panel local bending stress, panel design methods

京ICP备13015787号-3
版权所有 © 2013《水力发电学报》编辑部
编辑部地址:中国北京清华大学水电工程系 邮政编码:100084 电话:010-62783813
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn