水力发电学报
            首 页   |   期刊介绍   |   编委会   |   投稿须知   |   下载中心   |   联系我们   |   学术规范   |   编辑部公告   |   English

水力发电学报

• •    

连接柱处理对圆盘泵性能及内部流场影响研究

  

  • 出版日期:2024-04-25 发布日期:2024-04-25

Study on the effect of connecting column treatment on the performance and internal flow field of disc pumps

  • Online:2024-04-25 Published:2024-04-25

摘要: 本文总结圆盘泵数值模拟方面的研究,发现现有研究通常将连接柱区域水体与叶轮内水体作为一个整体设置为静止域,实际情况则是连接柱区域水体随叶轮转动而旋转,未有相关研究评估这种简化处理所带来的影响。本文以此对该区域设置了两种不同的模型方案:一种与已有研究保持一致,将该区域水体设置为静止域(方案一),另一种将该区域按实际情况设置为旋转域(方案二)。运用基于计算流体力学软件Fluent平台,采用Realizable k-ε湍流模型对圆盘泵内的流动进行数值模拟。分析了不同流量工况下(0.8Qn、1.0Qn和1.2Qn)圆盘泵叶轮内速度分布、总压分布、湍动能变化、流线分布以及扬程和效率,并搭建泵性能测试试验台进行圆盘泵性能测试,以对计算结果进行验证。对两种方案的计算结果进行对比分析,结果表明:方案一连接柱两侧出现明显低速区域,方案二由于连接柱周围水体旋转,因此区域速度值更大。两种方案均在叶片吸力面位置出现局部低压,这是流体流过叶片表面,在下游形成旋涡导致能量耗散的结果,因此圆盘泵内湍动能耗散主要出现在叶片及其吸力面侧,而在进、出口能量耗散较小。流体流过连接柱之后,方案二的圆周速度和绝对速度圆周分量均小于方案一,表明了圆盘泵实际运行过程中,连接柱对出口流动的阻碍作用产生的损失大于其带来的能量,导致方案二的扬程低于方案一。两种方案的计算结果与试验结果变化趋势一致,同时两种方案之间的差异较小,如果仅考虑快速计算圆盘泵性能,方案一在模型处理上更简单高效。如果要获得更全面准确的内部流动信息,方案二的内部流动情况更接近实际情况。

Abstract: This paper summarizes the existing research on the numerical simulations of the disc pump, and found that the existing studies usually set the water body in the connecting column area and the water body in the impeller as a whole as a stationary domain, while the actual situation is that the water body in the connecting column area rotates with the rotation of the impeller, and there is no study to assess the impact of this simplified treatment. In this paper, two different modeling scenarios are developed for this region: one is consistent with the existing studies and sets the water column in this region as a static domain (Scheme I), and the other sets the region as a rotating domain (Scheme II) according to the actual situation. Numerical simulation of the flow in the disc pump was carried out using the Realizable k-ε turbulence model based on the Fluent platform. The velocity distribution, total pressure distribution, turbulent kinetic energy, streamline distribution, pump head and efficiency of the disc pump are analyzed under different flow conditions (0.8Qn, 1.0Qn, and 1.2Qn), and the pump performance test rig is constructed to validate the calculation results. By comparing the numerical results of the two schemes, it has been found that a significant low velocity region on both sides of the connecting column in scheme I, whereas the local velocity value is higher for scheme II due to the set-up of near wall fluid. Because of the vortexes generated by flow separation from the blade surface, local low-pressure areas are presented on the blade suction side for two schemes, and the formed vortexes also result in the increase of local energy dissipation. Therefore, the turbulent energy dissipations in the disc pump are mainly concentrated in the blade suction side, whereas the energy dissipations near the pump inlet and outlet are small. After the fluid flows through the connecting column, the circumferential velocity and the circumferential component of the absolute velocity of Scheme II are smaller than the values of Scheme I, which indicates that in the actual operation of the disc pump, the losses generated by the blocking effect of the connecting column on the outlet flow is greater than the energy brought by itself, resulting in the head of Scheme II lower than Scheme I. The calculation results of the two schemes are consistent with the trend of the experimental results, and the performance differences between them are rather small, which means schemes I is simpler and efficient if only consider the rapid calculation of pump performance. However, scheme II is preferred if the aim is to get more comprehensive and accurate internal flow information.

京ICP备13015787号-3
版权所有 © 2013《水力发电学报》编辑部
编辑部地址:中国北京清华大学水电工程系 邮政编码:100084 电话:010-62783813
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn