水力发电学报
            首 页   |   期刊介绍   |   编委会   |   投稿须知   |   下载中心   |   联系我们   |   学术规范   |   编辑部公告   |   English

水力发电学报

• •    

平原河网水动力优化调度与水环境改善的响应关系研究

  

  • 出版日期:2024-03-18 发布日期:2024-03-18

Study on the response relationship between hydrodynamic optimization scheduling and water environment improvement in plain river network

  • Online:2024-03-18 Published:2024-03-18

摘要: 平原河网河道流动性较差是引起水环境污染严重的主要原因,引调水是改善平原河网地区水环境的重要措施之一。本文以佛山市三山围为例,基于实测资料构建了河网水动力水质耦合模型,采用15天的连续水动力水质监测数据对模型进行了验证,并将NSE和RMSE模型评价指标用于模型评价。同时结合地势、潮汐规律和景观水位等设计了4种闸控模式和7种景观控制水位,共28种模拟工况,模拟分析了不同条件下的水动力水质改善与内外江潮位变化、引排水流量及其空间分布、闸控方式和景观水位等综合响应机理。结果表明:构建的模型合理可靠。研究区域受引排水路径的影响,河道流动性差异较为显著。综合考虑河道流量分布、水流路径、分汊河道分流作用和外江污染物浓度等对河道水质的作用效果并有效结合潮汐河网的动态水环境容量和污染源排放的时空分布对水环境的改善作用将非常显著。与低景观控制水位相比,高景观控制水位的内江动态水环境容量相对较大,污染物浓度较低。景观控制水位从0.2上升至0.8 m时,不同引调水路径的引水流量上升28.00-64.70 %,断面氨氮浓度削减了0.85-5.50 mg/L,削减比例达到28.89-67.23 %。本研究为平原潮汐河网水环境优化调度研究提供了新的思路,为相关部门对平原河网的水环境改善提供了重要的参考。

Abstract: The poor mobility of river channels in plain river network is the main cause of serious water environment pollution. Water diversion is one of the important measures to improve the water environment in plain river network area. In this paper, taking Sanshanwei of Foshan City as an example, a hydrodynamic and water quality coupling model of river network was constructed based on the measured data. The model was verified by 15 days of continuous hydrodynamic and water quality monitoring data. The NSE and RMSE model evaluation indexes were used for model evaluation. Four kinds of gate control methods and seven kinds of landscape water level control were designed based on terrain, tidal law and landscape water level. A total of 28 simulation conditions were used to simulate and analyze the improvement of hydrodynamic water quality and the change of tidal level of inner and outer rivers under different conditions, the comprehensive response mechanism of water diversion and drainage flow and its spatial distribution, gate control mode and landscape water level. The results show that the model is reasonable and reliable. The study area is affected by the drainage path, and the difference of river flow is significant. Considering the effect of river flow distribution, water flow path, diversion effect of bifurcated river channel and pollutant concentration of outer river on river water quality, and effectively combining the dynamic water environment capacity of tidal river network and the spatial and temporal distribution of pollution source discharge, the improvement effect of water environment will be very significant. Compared with the low landscape control water level, the dynamic water environment capacity of inner river with high landscape control water level is relatively increased, and the pollutant concentration is relatively low. The diversion flow of different diversion paths increased by 28.00-64.70 % when the landscape control water level increased from 0.2 to 0.8 m. The ammonia nitrogen concentration in the section was reduced by 0.85-5.50 mg/L, and the reduction ratio reached 28.89-67.23 %. This study provides a new idea for the optimization of water environment in plain tidal river network, and provides an important reference value for the relevant departments to improve the water environment of plain river network.

京ICP备13015787号-3
版权所有 © 2013《水力发电学报》编辑部
编辑部地址:中国北京清华大学水电工程系 邮政编码:100084 电话:010-62783813
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发  技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn